my.blogorrhée and... dependencies Comments - Brought to you by JoeUserhttp://marouki.joeuser.com/rss/comments© 2006 - 2008 Stardock Corporation. All rights reserved. Uti, Non Abuti - Use de tout, mais n'abuse de rien. en-us2008-07-24T02:52:062008-07-24T02:52:06http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/rss/rss.htmlStardock Rss Generator v1.0, Andrew Powellinfo@stardock.comapowell@stardock.comCikomyrhttp://marouki.joeuser.com/article/315548http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/315548http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/315548Wed, 23 Jul 2008 22:52:06 -04002008-07-24T02:52:06Cikomyr on A quelque chose malheur est bonSanChoninohttp://marouki.joeuser.com/article/314636All languages are equal but girls ...

I concede. You are correct. ]]>http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/314636http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/314636Wed, 23 Jul 2008 22:52:06 -04002008-07-24T02:52:06SanChonino on About VirginitySanChoninohttp://marouki.joeuser.com/article/314636http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/314636http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/314636Wed, 23 Jul 2008 22:52:06 -04002008-07-24T02:52:06SanChonino on About VirginitySanChoninohttp://marouki.joeuser.com/article/314636]]>http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/314636http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/314636Wed, 23 Jul 2008 22:52:06 -04002008-07-24T02:52:06SanChonino on About VirginityOckhamsRazorhttp://marouki.joeuser.com/article/314636]]>http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/314636http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/314636Wed, 23 Jul 2008 22:52:06 -04002008-07-24T02:52:06OckhamsRazor on About VirginityCharlesCShttp://marouki.joeuser.com/article/162061
Pardonner ma traduction. Ce n'est pas le meilleur.
(Forgive my translation. It's not the best.)]]>http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/162061http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/162061Wed, 23 Jul 2008 22:52:06 -04002008-07-24T02:52:06CharlesCS on Les Elections n'ont rien d'extraordinaire !CharlesCShttp://marouki.joeuser.com/article/162061 ]]>http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/162061http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/162061Wed, 23 Jul 2008 22:52:06 -04002008-07-24T02:52:06CharlesCS on Les Elections n'ont rien d'extraordinaire !Cikomyrhttp://marouki.joeuser.com/article/160236And can you give me 1 reason that at the age of 52, that I should learn another?

Well, you only "learned" 1 language. Your primary language isn't much "learning" as "growing" into it.

I grew in French (I consider myself lucky. French is quite, quite hard to learn), and I learned - still mastering - english.

So.. 1 reason at the age of 52, that you should learn english?

- Intellectual challenge/amusement
- Be able to read French news without the distortion of American media (quite refreshing to learn about a country trough their OWN media, not by your own news service. That's why I know much more about US and it's mentality than the average Quebecker)
- Voulez vous coucher avec moi, se soir?
- There are AWESOME french culture products that you could enjoy in the original version - which is way better. "Le Diner de Cons" is an awesome comedy movie, which NEVER have been equaled by anything in english. English subtitles makes it understandable for you (and they are quite good quality translation. They even manage to translate the emotion), but nothing beats the original version of Mr Pignon. ]]>http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/160236http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/160236Wed, 23 Jul 2008 22:52:06 -04002008-07-24T02:52:06Cikomyr on La CIA éclaire sur le Saharadrmilerhttp://marouki.joeuser.com/article/160236Lazy to learn French"? I learned English and Spanish (Mexican type), that ain't enough?


clearly, no

What is your first language?

English. And can you give me 1 reason that at the age of 52, that I should learn another?

Personnally, i can't find myself in English. It's a question of rythm for me, even so my main language is arabic !

Not lazy at


I would never call youu lazy.]]>http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/160236http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/160236Wed, 23 Jul 2008 22:52:06 -04002008-07-24T02:52:06drmiler on La CIA éclaire sur le SaharaCikomyrhttp://marouki.joeuser.com/article/160236"Lazy to learn French"? I learned English and Spanish (Mexican type), that ain't enough?

clearly, no

What is your first language?]]>http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/160236http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/160236Wed, 23 Jul 2008 22:52:06 -04002008-07-24T02:52:06Cikomyr on La CIA éclaire sur le Saharadrmilerhttp://marouki.joeuser.com/article/160236sight* here for those who are unable to find a french/english translator, or too lazy to learn french.


"Lazy to learn French"? I learned English and Spanish (Mexican type), that ain't enough? ]]>http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/160236http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/160236Wed, 23 Jul 2008 22:52:06 -04002008-07-24T02:52:06drmiler on La CIA éclaire sur le Saharadrmilerhttp://marouki.joeuser.com/article/160236Une pensée pour une autre : mon anglais est assez boîteux pour supporter mes lourdeurs, parfois

  ]]>http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/160236http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/160236Wed, 23 Jul 2008 22:52:06 -04002008-07-24T02:52:06drmiler on La CIA éclaire sur le SaharaCikomyrhttp://marouki.joeuser.com/article/160236
The CIA just declassified a surprising historical document (LINK) about the sandy conflict of Western Sahara. Dated of the 23th February 1985, the former "top secret" document reveal that Algeria, at the time leaded by the President Chadli Bendjedid, proposed to the King Hassann II some kind of autonomy for the contested territory. "The Saharians would control their internal affairs, while Hassann II would be king of the territory when it comes to international organisations". This recalls the negociation of the time in Long Island, under U.N.'s supervision. Right now, the Chérifian Kingdom is negociating it's autonomy, being in conflict with the Saharians independantists of Polisario, officially and inconditionnaly supported by Alger. In those time, the document clearly state that Morroco refused the Algerian proposition, fearing the erosion of it's sovreignty to it's neighboor's profit. Lended hand or diplomatic ruse, the CIA now suspect in it's memo Algeria to have acted in the goal of revealing the very strong nationalism tendancy of the Kingdom. It's the world upside down.


Personnaly, I don't have any idea what is the point of such article, except maybe a small history lesson about the Morroco/Algerie regional rivalry


]]>http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/160236http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/160236Wed, 23 Jul 2008 22:52:06 -04002008-07-24T02:52:06Cikomyr on La CIA éclaire sur le Saharadrmilerhttp://marouki.joeuser.com/article/160236http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/160236http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/160236Wed, 23 Jul 2008 22:52:06 -04002008-07-24T02:52:06drmiler on La CIA éclaire sur le SaharaDr Guyhttp://marouki.joeuser.com/article/141375I do wish you'd post in english at least once in a while.

WWW Link

Roughly, and it is rough:

The American wide-area networks of television were thus invited in democracy, one does not say “not requisitioned” to diffuse Wednesday evening the short speech of the president of the United States. The owners of the “networks” only very mollement resisted. However, one cannot say that the effect of surprise was particularly well spared. Forty-eight hours before this truth-false media event, NewYork Times had already very revealed plan intended “to rectify” it is the official word the situation in Iraq. Put besides one or two replacements with the head of the staff, and an economic aid without relationship with the real needs, one will retain of it especially a figure: twenty thousand. It is the number of additional soldiers who should come in reinforcement from the 132.000 soldiers already stationed in the country. Vis-a-vis an increasingly hostile American opinion with the war of Iraq, and which let it know at the beginning of November spectacularly by giving to the democratic opposition a majority to the Congress, George W. Bush thus what is called an escape practises ahead. It persists in its error until the limits of the provocation. It is obstinated until the refusal of democracy. The nonsense of this policy lies in another figure raised these last days by the press of on the other side of the Atlantic: by crossing the course of the three thousand American soldiers killed in Iraq, the war “against the terrorism”, which was to avenge the United States for the attacks of September 11, 2001, already made more American deaths than the explosion of the twin towers of New York. One of the fine flies of the preserving clan, Frederick Kagan, member of the ' think tank ' American Enterprise Institute, justified this choice that him and his/her friends inspired while prophesying that, “no matter what we make, the year 2007 will be bloody in Iraq”. “We will have to agree the tragedy to lose soldiers”, it added, before questioning ourselves: “Will we will pay this price and will gain, or pay an identical price and lose? ” One would like to be able to request from Mr. Kagan what “to gain” wants to say in its spirit. Because, at all events, this useless war, and without relationship with the attacks which were used as alibi, is already lost for everyone. Initially for the Iraqi people, which left in the cities transformed into battle fields several hundreds of thousands of civil victims. It is lost for a country whose economy is destroyed. But it is also lost for America of Mr. Bush. Because Iraq was precipitated in an intercommunity war which reinforces the great close regional power, Iran. That made a long time that observers underlined this paradox: the adventurous company of George W. Bush ends so that it could fear the worst according to the vision manichéenne which is his. And it is here that it is once again advisable to question the concept of victory. The objectives by the entourage of Mr. Bush are not goals of war but of transformation of the world. One never should lose sight of the fact but some of the first “visionaries” of what one calls the American neoconservatism were former trotskists, like Irving Kristoll, who transfered on the right but did not give up a bronze voluntarism, nor with an ideal which is identified as by enchantment with the economic interests of the United States. They inherited a vulgate Marxist, quasi Bolshevik, whom they reversed bottom over head with the profit of their new cause. In their imagination, the American army holds revolutionary place of party. Alchemy néoconservatrice is born from their meeting with doctrinary monks. Until where the attraction of a final victory can thus lead them? Not need to force itself much to imagine that the following stage could be an attack counters Iran. In this context, information published Sunday by Sunday Times giving a report on an Israeli plan of destruction of the Iranian installations of enrichment of uranium is far from being absurd. This plan, indeed, of joined another which had been revealed last April by the American magazine New Yorker. With this difference close it was then directly the Pentagon which was to be with the operation. Lastly, it should be remembered that Israel had conducted an attack of the same kind in 1981 against the Iraqi nuclear installations of Osirak. There is thus nothing absurdity in spite of the Israeli official denials. Then, a war moreover to make forget the preceding one? One is well far in any case from the Baker-Hamilton ratio, published on December 6 (see Politis n° 930). This one recommended that one starts with the resolution of the israélo-Palestinian conflict, that one joins again the dialogue with Iran and Syria, and that the United States disengages itself gradually of Iraq. A logic reverses which does not speak any more “victory”, but of dialogue and appeasing, and solutions basic with the tensions which threaten this area of the world. But, at the White House, it is not so much the reality which counts that the ideology.


]]>http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/141375http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/141375Wed, 23 Jul 2008 22:52:06 -04002008-07-24T02:52:06Dr Guy on La Fuite en Avantdrmilerhttp://marouki.joeuser.com/article/141375 I do wish you'd post in english at least once in a while.]]>http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/141375http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/141375Wed, 23 Jul 2008 22:52:06 -04002008-07-24T02:52:06drmiler on La Fuite en Avantjennifer1http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/139851Europe, among them France, has become underdeveloped due to acute economic and political crisis while Africa has gone through very thriving development.


Won't that be some history in the making! - fiction that will never happen - Africa thriving that is!

Is the film sub titled?]]>http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/139851http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/139851Wed, 23 Jul 2008 22:52:06 -04002008-07-24T02:52:06jennifer1 on Africa Paradisejennifer1http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/139738how does bin laden remain in the wind after 5 years of being hunted by the world's most powerful nation utilizing the world's most advanced technology?

he's permitted to do so is--very sadly--the most likely explanation.

No - it is because the asshole is dead and myth is what keeps him alive - the us killed him yonks ago.]]>http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/139738http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/139738Wed, 23 Jul 2008 22:52:06 -04002008-07-24T02:52:06jennifer1 on Catch me if you can' Ben LadenPaladin77http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/139738]]>http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/139738http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/139738Wed, 23 Jul 2008 22:52:06 -04002008-07-24T02:52:06Paladin77 on Catch me if you can' Ben LadenPaladin77http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/139738how does bin laden remain in the wind after 5 years of being hunted by the world's most powerful nation utilizing the world's most advanced technology?

Kingbee,

How is it that people on the FBI 10 most wanted list are there for years without being caught? It must be the FBI wants them out there. My brother-in-law was on the list for 3 years when he was caught he was a school bus driver in Chicago, before that he was a police dispatcher in Atlanta. So the FBI and local police wanted him on the streets cause they could have picked him up any time according to you.]]>http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/139738http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/139738Wed, 23 Jul 2008 22:52:06 -04002008-07-24T02:52:06Paladin77 on Catch me if you can' Ben Ladenkingbeehttp://marouki.joeuser.com/article/139738
he's permitted to do so is--very sadly--the most likely explanation.

]]>http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/139738http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/139738Wed, 23 Jul 2008 22:52:06 -04002008-07-24T02:52:06kingbee on Catch me if you can' Ben LadenCharlesCShttp://marouki.joeuser.com/article/139320]]>http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/139320http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/139320Wed, 23 Jul 2008 22:52:06 -04002008-07-24T02:52:06CharlesCS on Bush Under PressurePaladin77http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/139320]]>http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/139320http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/139320Wed, 23 Jul 2008 22:52:06 -04002008-07-24T02:52:06Paladin77 on Bush Under PressureLarbihttp://marouki.joeuser.com/article/139320 Tu connais la dernière ? Bush s’est empressé de nommer trois ou quatre autres commissions néo-cons chargées d’étudier le même dossier et faire des recommandations. L’idée ingénieuse : présenter le rapport de Baker comme un rapport entre autres comme les trois autres. Bref faire noyer le poisson.
Je suis assez sceptique. L’administration américaine ne fonctionne pas en fonction de la raison mais selon l’idéologie. N’oublies pas que quand le monde entier disait non à la guerre contre l’Irak ils y sont allé quand même.
Bref inutile de raison avec le « Born again »
]]>http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/139320http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/139320Wed, 23 Jul 2008 22:52:06 -04002008-07-24T02:52:06Larbi on Bush Under PressureLarbihttp://marouki.joeuser.com/article/136745 Une idée proposée par abmoul: Pourquoi Bziz ne profites pas du Web2.0 et mets sur dailymotion ou youtube pleines de vidéos de ses spectacles? il sera assuré d'une audience spectaculaire sans censurer sans demander la permission de personne!
]]>http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/136745http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/136745Wed, 23 Jul 2008 22:52:06 -04002008-07-24T02:52:06Larbi on Bziz toujours à l'IndexLarbihttp://marouki.joeuser.com/article/136745 Mais je sais pas… je reste sceptique quand j’entends qu’il ne reçoit que dans les grands hôtels de la capitale. Plus est je crois savoir qu’on lui a proposé un passage à la télé et il refuse en exigeant que cela soit … en Direct.
Bien entendu je crois qu’on doit le laisser s’exprimer librement (je crois pas que ça doit passer nécessairement par la télé) mais des fois je me demande si cette situation ne l’arrange pas et qu’il ne fait pas tout pour qu’il dure.
Marouki entendons-nous : Qu’on lui refuse une salle pour ses spectacles ou lui interdit de répondre à une invitation dans une cité universitaire je crois que c’est un abus de pouvoir condamnable. Mais quand il exige un passage direct à la télé je crois qu’il en fait trop. Même s’il est sûrement beaucoup plus doué que ceux qui y passent. Mais il n'est pas le seul.]]>http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/136745http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/136745Wed, 23 Jul 2008 22:52:06 -04002008-07-24T02:52:06Larbi on Bziz toujours à l'IndexNKhttp://marouki.joeuser.com/article/135908
In the country of kangaroos, an Egyptian mufti, Sheik Taj Aldine Al-Hillali, ended up defraying the chronicle; according to which, verbatim in Time Magazine, "If you take out uncovered meat and place it outside on the street or in the garden or in the park or in the backyard without a cover, and the cats come and eat it, whose fault is it – the cats' or the uncovered meat?".

I will save you the moral implications and the official and public outcry caused by these statements... Beyond this incident, altogether condemnable, the cover by Al-jazeera, I do not know if you saw it, adds another layer... I will exlain. Often in the Western media, when one speaks about Moslems, evidence to the image, they are always represented as bearded, dressed as jahadists, praying in the public street, whereas the Moslems are not at all, far from this picture, bearded and a considerable quantity do not apply to the orthodoxe duty of the prayer. The chain qatariote did better in this kind of skewed semiotics: by evoking the incident, it joined, always in images, the Western stereotype with the ulterior Moslem motive, in a subliminal message. Beyond the bearded Moslems, there are images of bikini lolitas trotting in the so famous beaches of Australia. In fact, this kind of a priori televisual does nothing but corroborate the dogma so much sempiternal, according to which all the Moslems would be epigones of immaculate morals - with this famous ontological HIDAYA with the load -, vis-a-vis with Westerners or Western which pataugent in the dissolution of the m?urs with force to be undressed so much, and of course inclined with an unslung lubricity... Many time, Al-jazeera does nothing but vomit with application the language of the village, to dance the folklore. Far from the honest idea and broadmindedness, it gives of it only the spectacle, the emptied form. Obviously, the Imam can only exulter... "]]>http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/135908http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/135908Wed, 23 Jul 2008 22:52:06 -04002008-07-24T02:52:06NK on La patrie,cet objet obscur/Al-jazeera,imagerie subliminaleDeferencehttp://marouki.joeuser.com/article/136343
Since many years, we defend here an idea which is not very original, though disputed all the same by some: the israélo-Palestinian conflict is not a regional conflict like another. Its importance is measured neither on the surface of the disputed territories, neither with the socio-economic weight of its protagonists, nor even with the number of its victims. Ilest for us others, French, or European, or Western, a central conflict which poisons our companies. Etc' is little to say that it represents for the world arabo-Moslem a kind of flat-topped outlier of the relations with the Occident. If our media cover it and perhaps surcouvrent it, each one with its sensitivity, it thus has nothing abnormal there. Any event which occurs on the side of Jerusalem, Ramallah or Gaza, Tel-Aviv or even of Beirut determines a little the mood of the world. Thus, once more, the images of the carnage of Beit Hanoun upset the opinion under all the latitudes. Nineteen died in this village of the north of the Gaza Strip, destroyed by Israeli missiles. A whole decimated family... It is to be howled. As is to be howled when a human bomb strikes civil Israelis, in a bus or a restaurant. Àcette difference close it is on a side a modern State, abrasive of the most sophisticated weapons, which strikes with a cold determination; and other, individuals or groups carried by the rage and despair. On a side, it is the State and reason of State, which does not want, at the bottom, to yield an inch of its colonial project; and other, it is the insanity which results from a feeling of impotence. But to the insupportable images of Beit Hanoun was added a political fact which worsens the significance of it. It acts of course of the American veto opposite Sunday with the Security Council of UNO to an Arab resolution condemning the massacre (and drawn Palestinian rockets on Sderot). In its injustice narquoise, this veto is morally as terrible as the massacre itself. It defends the absolute not-right once more. When it is known that this conflict is carried out permanently under the eyes of the whole world, and that many forges their morals there, one measures the damage which such a political act can cause. Despair from New York, where seat UNO. The hope thus comes besides. It comes initially from the revival of the inter-Palestinian negotiation aiming at constituting a government of national union, mixing representatives with Hamas, of the Fatah and personalities of the civil company. One remembers that this negotiation was about to lead to last June when the removal of an Israeli soldier and laviolente repression which followed blocked the process. Remain to know if Israel would agree to discuss with such a government, or if other quibbles would be advanced to once more reject the possibility of a dialogue. In parallel, the hope also comes from the Arab League. What is rather rare if one considers the historical obliteration of the Arab capitals in this conflict. For once, a proposal spouted out of a meeting convened in urgency Sunday in Cairo. The countries of the League are agreed to pour funds bound for the Palestinian Authority and to thus try to break the economic blockade imposed by Israel. The same ones planned to start again the Saoudi initiative of 2002: a total and final normalization of the relations between the Arab world and Israel in exchange of a withdrawal of the territories occupied since 1967. Four years ago, Israel had swept of a reverse of hand this offer of total peace. The Saoudi Minister for the Foreign Affairs has this time suggested that this plan is discussed during an international conference in which would take part Israéliens and Palestinians. Thus putting each one vis-a-vis at its responsibilities. Hamas included/understood. Seen from here, one can only be authorized this interrogation: isn't it paradoxical that the offer of peace comes from the feudalism of Riyadh, and not of one or several large Western capitals? The things a little also move in Washington. The demolished cuisante of Bush to the elections with the Congress, le7 November, and the Iraqi crisis start to make audible of other voices. For a certain time already, the old man James Baker, former owner of the American diplomacy under George Bush father, and promoter in 1991 of the conference of Madrid, militates in favour of a dialogue with Iran and Syria. It would be obviously the end of "the axis of the Evil", expensive with the Bush little boy. Still it for that would be necessary that the dialogue is open without conditions. It would also be necessary that it israélo-Palestinian conflict is recognized. Baker wants to discuss well with Iranian president Ahmadinejad, but not with Hamas. What at the bottom is hardly astonishing. To recognize the Palestinian direction for what it is, it is to start to consider a solution with this conflict (1). And it is to take the risk to be quickly overhanging with Israel. What remains unthinkable today still among Democrats as at the Republicans. Denis Sieffert in Politis Link 1 Lire excels it article of Hind Khoury: Jerusalem-est, symbol of impunity in the World]]>http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/136343http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/136343Wed, 23 Jul 2008 22:52:06 -04002008-07-24T02:52:06Deference on American Veto Damageswhoman69http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/136343http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/136343http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/136343Wed, 23 Jul 2008 22:52:06 -04002008-07-24T02:52:06whoman69 on American Veto DamagesCikomyrhttp://marouki.joeuser.com/article/133795
Okay, here is the Translation everyone:

Walls[/B]

When, the 9th November 1989, fell Berlin’s wall, many beleived that a new era was beginning. Didn’t the crash of the communism system marked the absolute victory of democracies? The end of the Cold War, it was finally the universal peace : we would finally be able to disarm together and invest to eradicate misery from the globe. It was “the end of History”, damn it! And we would not have to build other walls other than those who shells our happiness and our private lives…

Time soon washed away those chimeras. Those who said History never ends were rights, because it’s fuel is the battle between social classes. Yhea, we changed era : the capitalism didn’t had any enemy to its height, no brakes to its expansion, no limits to its hungriness, and we quickly realised it. And the axes of fighting simply changed: The East-West battle became North-South. And with is the Time of Walls. Isrealian Wall, that jails the Palestinian people in a sky-open cell, where it dies with a slow fire; (Etatsunien is the French appellation of “Americans”, because for us, “Américain” are those living in the continents) Etasuniens wall at the border with Mexico, to end the thing with the goddamned Chicanos(?) who came to eat our hot-dogs; war of Spanish enclaves in Marroco, where comes to die, stupid butterfly, the imprisoned children of the African misery; walls of paper of conventions, treaties, laws, orders from rich countries to stop the (sans-papier means illegal immigrants) sans-papiers from the countries of famish, walls of private enclaves, yhea, with spiked walls, with Cerberus, cameras, where the rich can preserve their privileges of an oversize hungriness : all the walls of shame presented as “necessary for the survival of our beautiful civilisation, because we HAVE to defend against barbarians, right?”

(There, found on the Net this tale who made me sourly laugh: we are in 2010, Sarkozy is president (of France). A big earthquake ravages Algeria. Thousands comes from the U.S.A, U.K… sanitarian teams, tons of drugs, clothes, etc.. from all corners of the world. France sends 35 000 Algerians.)

[B]Danger

Never the world has been that dangerous, as close to an explosion as in the beginning of a century and millennia. As invested, everywhere, in another arm-race.

Korea, uncaring of treats, exploded it’s toy; Iran, uncaring, still continues to work on his own. Why would they care, under Who’s name could we forbid them the attributes of power the World allowed India, Israel and Pakistan (not even talking about the “big”, nuclear powers of divine-rights?). And South Africa, Brasilia, where are they in this race? And Japan, when would he rearm?

Everywhere, chaos is installing. Iraq is more than ever only flame and blood; in Afghanitsan, Talibans as slowly gaining ground from where we chased them (with a big announcing that we restored “democracy”, what a joke!), and the pavot culture expanding; in devasted Lebanon, still waiting the next invasion, the U.S.-made frag bombs launched by Isreal are still killing each days : I let you add all the “etc..”

Yhea, Putin is a true asshole. Yhea, the atisemite and negationnist(?) declarations of a Ahmadinejad are imbecile and irresponsible. But you should not reduce Russia to it’s Tsar, nor Iran to it,s President. And I agree with Emmanuel Todd when he says “An aggressive America seeking to bring his allies into the War”, and estimates that “The U.S.A. are more dangerous than Iran for the World Peace” (2)
]]>http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/133795http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/133795Wed, 23 Jul 2008 22:52:06 -04002008-07-24T02:52:06Cikomyr on Tremolos of DemocracyLarbihttp://marouki.joeuser.com/article/131923
Ne pas oublier google. Quand tu tapes sur le google chinois Droits d’homme, on te renvoie vers la propagande maoïste. Je crois que Microsoft aussi fait quelque chose du genre pour le bien de la révolution.
Mais franchement, entre perdre des centaines de milliers de dollars dans le marché chinois et envoyer un journaliste en prison, je crois que les multinationales n’hésiteront pas une seconde. Il n’a y a pas d’éthiques dans les affaires, les pédégé ne sont pas des sœurs Emmanuelle.
]]>http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/131923http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/131923Wed, 23 Jul 2008 22:52:06 -04002008-07-24T02:52:06Larbi on Hypocrite Yahoojennifer1http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/131923http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/131923http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/131923Wed, 23 Jul 2008 22:52:06 -04002008-07-24T02:52:06jennifer1 on Hypocrite YahooErk.http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/131923
[Babelfish direct tranlation ~may not be completely accurate]

-----------------------------------------------
Through conversation with a journalist American, we come to learn that the American company Yahoo granted a purse of a million dollars to the university of Stanford (California) for a programme of support for the journalists "working in countries not respecting the freedom of expression".

The news initially made us laugh. Then the laughter made place with deep a faintness. Yahoo, journalists, freedom of expression... Doesn't that point out anything to you? Let us refresh our reports, and perhaps those of the leaders of Stanford.

This company collaborates since 2002 with the Chinese authorities to purge the Web of very contained "subversive". It is the first search engine to have agreed to censure its contents to like in Peijing. On Yahoo.cn, useless to seek a reference to the massacres of the Tiananmen place in 1989, or to the infringements of the humans right in the country, the results are filtered automatically by the Californian company.

Worse still. Reporters without borders discovered that Yahoo collaborated regularly with Chinese justice and was responsible for the arrest of several independent journalists. This company, which is prided today to support the journalism of investigation, indeed agreed to lodge its service of courriel on the Chinese territory.

Each time the police force asked him to identify the source of illegal electronic mails ­ which criticized the government ­ Yahoo is carried out without discussion. We have the proof that the giant of the Internet is implied in the arrest and the judgment of at least four journalists and militant democratic.

More known, Shi CAT, was condemned to ten years of prison, in April 2005, for "disclosure of secrecies of State abroad". The journalist was actually shown to have transmitted a note circulating within his newspaper which prohibited with the reporters to speak about the commemoration of the events of Tiananmen. Police officers, which knew that the electronic address used to forward this document was managed by Yahoo.cn, were addressed directly to the American company to help them to pin the "criminal".

The latter immediately transmitted all information of which it laid out ­ addresses IP of the computer, contents of the messages and the enclosures, etc ­, thus offering the file of charge of the journalist. And it is this company, true model of compromising in a repressive mode, which comes today to be praised to support independent journalism! Already, when Yahoo had announced to launch out in the great report, discharging a considered journalist, Kevin Sites, to make him follow the great conflicts of planet, the news had made smile.

The first rule, when one regards oneself as media of information, is to protect its fellow-members. No drafting of a democratic country would agree to give one of its contacts in grazing ground to the police force of a repressive State, even less if it acts of a journalist.

In Yahoo, that did not pose a problem. They say new media, not hesitating to relegate the press to the row of dinosaur of information, but, when one speaks to them about ethics of journalism, they hide behind excuses "business": "We are really afflicted by these judgments. But we are a private company and we must yield with the local laws ", declare in chorus the Californian leaders.

Then, when we hear Jerry Yang, the chairman of Yahoo, to affirm without reddening which it is committed "facilitating the access to free information", eh well, yes, we have a heave. We wish to especially to say him that it will repurchase neither its image nor its conscience with this million dollars. If he wants to show in the world and his customers whom he respects the freedom of expression, that he proves it in China, not by distributing alms, was it consequent.

-------------------
By Robert MENARD, Julien BREAD in Liberation.fr Robert Ménard: secretary-general of Reporters without borders Julien Bread: person in charge for Office Internet and freedoms of the organization.]]>http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/131923http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/131923Wed, 23 Jul 2008 22:52:06 -04002008-07-24T02:52:06Erk. on Hypocrite YahooLarbihttp://marouki.joeuser.com/article/131467
j'ai ca en retour:
"Your message contains invalid content and cannot be accepted. "
et pourtant j'ai rien dit de mal ]]>http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/131467http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/131467Wed, 23 Jul 2008 22:52:06 -04002008-07-24T02:52:06Larbi on Byzantine Quarrel ...Larbihttp://marouki.joeuser.com/article/131467http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/131467http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/131467Wed, 23 Jul 2008 22:52:06 -04002008-07-24T02:52:06Larbi on Byzantine Quarrel ...Larbihttp://marouki.joeuser.com/article/127768
]]>http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/127768http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/127768Wed, 23 Jul 2008 22:52:06 -04002008-07-24T02:52:06Larbi on Tactics...houdahttp://marouki.joeuser.com/article/127768http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/127768http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/127768Wed, 23 Jul 2008 22:52:06 -04002008-07-24T02:52:06houda on Tactics...Myrranderhttp://marouki.joeuser.com/article/125093 La situation entière est le produit du colonialisme. Les restes de l'empire de tabouret sont venus à la vie et nous hantent maintenant comme des fantômes.]]>http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/125093http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/125093Wed, 23 Jul 2008 22:52:06 -04002008-07-24T02:52:06Myrrander on The Cynicskingbeehttp://marouki.joeuser.com/article/106706 almost enuff to make ya wonder whether osama isn't really a transvestite with multiple personality disorder. add a beard to that face...consider the long legs...all that's missing is a walking stick, an ak and dr whatsazawahiri by his/her side.

it would also explain why he's so well loved (heh) in nw pakistan! ]]>http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/106706http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/106706Wed, 23 Jul 2008 22:52:06 -04002008-07-24T02:52:06kingbee on Bin Laden niece seeks spotlightlemrinahttp://marouki.joeuser.com/article/106706 amazin'!]]>http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/106706http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/106706Wed, 23 Jul 2008 22:52:06 -04002008-07-24T02:52:06lemrina on Bin Laden niece seeks spotlightbakerstreethttp://marouki.joeuser.com/article/103775 I have mixed feelings. I under no circumstances want Iran to have nuclear weapons, but it isn't going to be nearly as simple as giving them a firm smack. The American press is woefully blind, and I think purposefully so. They are dwelling on this port deal when much more frightening things are at hand. My greatest worry is China's reaction.

Re: Madsen, I'm not a fan. My personal belief is that he is a sham, and I have felt such since he claimed that the USS Cole was really struch by an Israeli missile. No offense to your own beliefs intended, I just find him to be someone straining so hard to villify the Bush administration that he would believe anything that was said, no matter how far-fetched.]]>http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/103775http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/103775Wed, 23 Jul 2008 22:52:06 -04002008-07-24T02:52:06bakerstreet on Wayne Madsen ReportLarbihttp://marouki.joeuser.com/article/100587 j'ai bien compris ... je te taquinais
dis tu veux pas quitter ce joeuser? j'aime pas trop.... a chaque fois que je viens ici c'est une vraie corvée que de charger la page. trop lourd comme systeme .

]]>http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/100587http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/100587Wed, 23 Jul 2008 22:52:06 -04002008-07-24T02:52:06Larbi on Silliness End UtopiaLarbihttp://marouki.joeuser.com/article/100587
Je dirais que ça s’apparente plutôt à une éloge de l’efficacité.
Efficacité de l’esprit, des questionnements, de l’échange, des lois …. bref de la pensée (sic !).
Je crains que tu seras battu (voire humilié) si tu te présente au suffrage universel avec ce programme là
]]>http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/100587http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/100587Wed, 23 Jul 2008 22:52:06 -04002008-07-24T02:52:06Larbi on Silliness End Utopiaamernayhttp://marouki.joeuser.com/article/97604http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/97604http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/97604Wed, 23 Jul 2008 22:52:06 -04002008-07-24T02:52:06amernay on Eid-Ul-Adhaamernayhttp://marouki.joeuser.com/article/100245 Ouf, il existe encore des gens qui pensent.
Lisez aussi www.u-blog.net/amernay/note/31
tanmirt

]]>http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/100245http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/100245Wed, 23 Jul 2008 22:52:06 -04002008-07-24T02:52:06amernay on Mahomet, le Spectacle Continue ...saidhttp://marouki.joeuser.com/article/97604http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/97604http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/97604Wed, 23 Jul 2008 22:52:06 -04002008-07-24T02:52:06said on Eid-Ul-Adhabrahimhttp://marouki.joeuser.com/article/97604 est ce que tu peux me donner la fréquence de cette chaine ,elle super! meilleure que la dite jazeera!]]>http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/97604http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/97604Wed, 23 Jul 2008 22:52:06 -04002008-07-24T02:52:06brahim on Eid-Ul-AdhaManopeacehttp://marouki.joeuser.com/article/97604 Bon Eid!]]>http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/97604http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/97604Wed, 23 Jul 2008 22:52:06 -04002008-07-24T02:52:06Manopeace on Eid-Ul-Adhamcdanielhttp://marouki.joeuser.com/article/93270 free palestine. ]]>http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/93270http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/93270Wed, 23 Jul 2008 22:52:06 -04002008-07-24T02:52:06mcdaniel on PALESTINELeaukihttp://marouki.joeuser.com/article/93270 First of all, it has been tried.

It has been tried without the wall. It has even been tried without the occupation.

The Arabs attacked.

Whatever stops them is right. They had the choice.

Arafat could have his independent "Palestine" five years ago. Instead he launched an "Intifada". He broke a cease-fire, he violated the peace agreement. And the Arabs are now paying for it. But they still revere him. As long as they do, they deserve whatever happens to them.

They still have a choice. It's up to them. Israel does not WANT to spend millions or billions on a security wall. Israel only does that because, in contrast to the Arabs, the Jews do not have a choice. They can either defend or die. The Arabs do not have that problem. Israel cannot eradicate all the Arab countries. But the Arab countries have tried to eradicate Israel.

Second, "coloniser and colonised"; it's not so simple. Had the Arabs not hunted down all the Arab Jews, Israel would not need to "colonise". OTOH over a million Arabs live in Israel and nobody demands that they leave.

It is true that the Jews lived among the Arabs for centuries, but they were always discriminated against. What do you think happened to the Jews of the Arab world? Why do you think where there more Jews in Europe than in the entire Arab world?

Thirdly, I find the often-used definition of "Palestinian" plain racist. A "Palestinian" is apparently a non-Jewish inhabitant of Palestine. This reminds me of the definition of "German" in the 1930s (a non-Jewish inhabitant of Germany). The only reason I can see for defining "Palestinian" thus is to pretend that no Jews lived in Palestine and that the "Palestinians" are the people the Jews replaced. It's simply not true.

If you look at statistics from the Ottoman Empire, you might not even find the "Palestinian" people that you speak of. The truth seems to be that very few people lived in the area, certainly not the millions of "Palestinians" who have suddenly appeared.

(Why does the UN support Arab refugees but not Jewish refugees?)

Now, we can talk about the wall, but the simple fact is that it is the only way to keep "Palestinians" from killing Jews. It's enough. The Jews are there to stay. Germany understood it, it's time the Arabs understand it. They cannot get rid of them. They tried (which is why the Arab world is now nearly Jew-free except for Palestine), but they won't succeed.

Your terminology is simple indeed. But it's _very close_ to the terminology employed by those who want to get rid of the Jews, in Europe 60 years ago (even in France), and in the Arab world today.]]>http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/93270http://marouki.joeuser.com/article/93270Wed, 23 Jul 2008 22:52:06 -04002008-07-24T02:52:06Leauki on PALESTINE